Which sentence from the most dangerous game suggest person vs person conflict?

Which sentence from the most dangerous game suggest person vs person conflict?

The case of man versus nature conflict can be seen/ found in the sentence “What perils that tangle of trees and underbrush might hold for him did not concern Rainsford just then.” This sentence is after Rainsford escaped to the forest, eluding the Colonel.

The sentence from “The Most Dangerous Game”, by Richard Connell, that suggests Person versus Person conflict is The man’s only answer was to raise with his thumb the hammer of his revolver.

How many acres did zaroff’s father have in the Crimea?

How many acres did Zaroff’s father have in the Crimea? He had a quarter of a million acres.

What is the conflict of the story The Most Dangerous Game?

The classic short story ‘The Most Dangerous Game’ illustrates two types of conflict: internal and external. The external conflict is the fight between General Zaroff and his captive Rainsford. The internal conflict is Rainsford’s recognition that there is a fine line between the hunter and the hunted.

What type of conflict is shown in this passage from a most dangerous game?

Internal. Explanation: In this passage is shown that he has an conflict within. Losing nerves is a internal issue or situation which is caused by an external stimulus.

What happens to Sanger Rainsford ironic?

The main irony in the plot of “The Most Dangerous Game” is in the fact that Sanger Rainsford, the world-famous big-game hunter, becomes the big-game being hunted. This is so bizarre that it is like a nightmare, both for Rainsford and for the reader who becomes engrossed in the story.

Why is it ironic that Rainsford is being hunted?

The most obvious irony is when Rainsford the hunter becomes the hunted. In the beginning of the story, it is clear that Rainsford is not just a hunter, but a very accomplished and skilled hunter. He has been around the world, and he loves the sport. Moreover, he has little regard for animals.