Which sentence has an incorrect shift in pronoun-antecedent agreement?

Which sentence has an incorrect shift in pronoun-antecedent agreement?

Answer Expert Verified The sentence with the incorrect shift in pronoun-antecedent agreement is: Neither Sue nor Maria wants her name put on the ballot. A pronoun is used to substitute a noun.

Which sentence has an incorrect shift in pronoun-antecedent agreement a Eleanor and Emma showed us her new dresses B the computers need to reboot their hard drives C The boys were kicking their soccer ball through the field d scary?

Answer is A, because the subject of the sentence, “Eleanor and Emma” is plural and should be matched with a plural pronoun–“their” instead of “her.” The sentence should read, “Eleanor and Emma showed us their new dresses.”

What is the agreement error in this sentence?

Answer: The agreement error in the sentence is that the pronoun “yourselves” does not agree with the antecedent “people” in number. Explanation: the pronoun’yourself’ is singular in the above sentence, therefore for the sentence to be flawless, it should refer back to a singular antecedent.

Which sentence has a pronoun antecedent error?

Since we do not know if the “person” in question is a man or a woman, we should use the phrase “his or her.” The correct answer is therefore “for the rest of his life.” In this sentence, the plural pronoun “sie” does not correspond to its unique predecessor, the “woolly mammoth.” The corrected sentence is: “The woolly …

What is the difference between pronoun and antecedent?

An antecedent is “the thing that came before”. When you use a pronoun, it’s standing in for a word you used previously—that’s the antecedent. Join us as we demonstrate how to make sure that your pronouns and antecedents match up with one another: that’s called agreement!

What is meaning of antecedent in law?

Antecedents are the life history and previous convictions of a defendant in a criminal case. They are colloquially known as “previous convictions” (or simply “previous”) in the United Kingdom and “prior convictions” (or simply “priors”) in the United States and Australia.

What is antecedent and consequent in ratio?

The ratio of two like quantities a and b is the quotient a ÷ b, and it is written as a : b (read a is to b). In the ratio a : b, a and b are called terms of the ratio, a is called the antecedent or first term, and b is called the consequent or second term.

What is antecedent and consequent in association rule?

Antecedent and Consequent The IF component of an association rule is known as the antecedent. The THEN component is known as the consequent. The antecedent and the consequent are disjoint; they have no items in common.

What is strong association rule?

1. An association rule having support and confidence greater than or equal to a user-specified minimum support threshold and respectively a minimum confidence threshold. Learn more in: Mining Association Rules.

How do you find strong association rules?

Given a set of transactions, we can find rules that will predict the occurrence of an item based on the occurrences of other items in the transaction….

  1. Support(s) –
  2. Support = (X+Y) total –
  3. Confidence(c) –
  4. Conf(X=>Y) = Supp(X Y) Supp(X) –
  5. Lift(l) –
  6. Lift(X=>Y) = Conf(X=>Y) Supp(Y) –

What is association rule with example?

So, in a given transaction with multiple items, Association Rule Mining primarily tries to find the rules that govern how or why such products/items are often bought together. For example, peanut butter and jelly are frequently purchased together because a lot of people like to make PB&J sandwiches.

What are the two steps of association rule mining?

Association rule mining, at a basic level, involves the use of machine learning models to analyze data for patterns, or co-occurrences, in a database. It identifies frequent if-then associations, which themselves are the association rules. An association rule has two parts: an antecedent (if) and a consequent (then).

What are the problems of association rule mining?

The main drawbacks of the association rule algorithms are the following: • Obtaining non interesting rules • Huge number of discovered rules • Low algorithm performance In this work a review of the main contributions in the literature for the resolution of these problems is carried out.

What is Apriori principle?

The apriori principle can reduce the number of itemsets we need to examine. Put simply, the apriori principle states that. if an itemset is infrequent, then all its supersets must also be infrequent. This means that if {beer} was found to be infrequent, we can expect {beer, pizza} to be equally or even more infrequent.

Why Apriori algorithm is used?

The Apriori algorithm is used for mining frequent itemsets and devising association rules from a transactional database. The parameters “support” and “confidence” are used. Support refers to items’ frequency of occurrence; confidence is a conditional probability. Items in a transaction form an item set.

What are the two steps of Apriori algorithm?

It was later improved by R Agarwal and R Srikant and came to be known as Apriori. This algorithm uses two steps “join” and “prune” to reduce the search space. It is an iterative approach to discover the most frequent itemsets.

What is the meaning of priori?

from the former

What is a priori hypothesis?

An a priori hypothesis is one that is generated prior to a research study taking place. A priori hypotheses are distinct from a posteriori hypotheses, which are generated after an observable phenomenon occurs. These types of hypotheses are deduced from these assumptions.

What is priori knowledge explain with examples?

A priori knowledge is that which is independent from experience. Examples include mathematics, tautologies, and deduction from pure reason. A posteriori knowledge is that which depends on empirical evidence. Examples include most fields of science and aspects of personal knowledge.

What is the opposite of a priori?

a priori(adj) involving deductive reasoning from a general principle to a necessary effect; not supported by fact. “an a priori judgment” Antonyms: empirical, a posteriori, empiric.

Is a priori deductive or inductive?

Something that is known a priori can safely be considered to be a true statement, assuming that the logic (or deductive reasoning) used to arrive at that conclusion is conducted using valid arguments. A priori is in contrast to a posteriori, which is a term used to indicate inductive reasoning.

Does a priori knowledge exist?

One school of thought is the Rationalist school which holds that knowledge can be gained independent of experience (a priori knowledge). In other words, a priori knowledge does not exist since knowledge cannot be obtained seperate of experience.

Which sentence has an error in pronoun-antecedent agreement?

In sentence D, “nobody” is singular while the pronoun “they” is plural. In this sentence, the pronoun “they” refers back to “nobody” as its antecedent. but “nobody” is a singular indefinite pronoun. Thus, there is an error in pronoun-antecedent agreement.

Which sentence contains a subject verb agreement error?

A subject/verb agreement error can occur in the following types of sentences. Error: One of my friends like to cook Italian food. (Agreement error: One = singular / like = plural) Correction: One of my friends likes to cook Italian food.

Which sentence contains a subject and verb?

A complete sentence contains a subject and verb and expresses a complete thought. However, a sentence fragment lacks some essential element of a sentence (such as a subject or verb) or does not express a complete thought.

Which sentence has an incorrect shift in pronoun antecedent agreement?

Which sentence has an incorrect shift in pronoun antecedent agreement?

Answer Expert Verified The sentence with the incorrect shift in pronoun-antecedent agreement is: Neither Sue nor Maria wants her name put on the ballot. A pronoun is used to substitute a noun.

Which sentence has an incorrect shift in pronoun antecedent agreement a Eleanor and Emma showed us her new dresses B the computers need to reboot their hard drives C The boys were kicking their soccer ball through the field d scary?

Answer is A, because the subject of the sentence, “Eleanor and Emma” is plural and should be matched with a plural pronoun–“their” instead of “her.” The sentence should read, “Eleanor and Emma showed us their new dresses.”

What is the antecedent of a pronoun it?

An antecedent is “the thing that came before”. When you use a pronoun, it’s standing in for a word you used previously—that’s the antecedent. Join us as we demonstrate how to make sure that your pronouns and antecedents match up with one another: that’s called agreement!

What is the difference between denying the antecedent and affirming the consequent?

The consequent of a conditional statement is the part that usually follows “then”. The part that usually follows “if” is called the “antecedent”. To affirm the consequent is, of course, to claim that the consequent is true. Thus, affirming the consequent in the example would be to claim that I have logic class.

Is affirming the consequent valid?

Modus ponens is a valid argument form in Western philosophy because the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion; however, affirming the consequent is an invalid argument form because the truth of the premises does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion.

What is an example of modus Ponens?

An example of an argument that fits the form modus ponens: If today is Tuesday, then John will go to work. Today is Tuesday. An argument can be valid but nonetheless unsound if one or more premises are false; if an argument is valid and all the premises are true, then the argument is sound.

What is modus tollens rule?

Modus tollens is a valid argument form in propositional calculus in which and are propositions. If implies , and is false, then. is false. Also known as an indirect proof or a proof by contrapositive. For example, if being the king implies having a crown, not having a crown implies not being the king.

Which is a lifted version of Modus Ponens?

4. Which is a lifted version of modus ponens? Explanation: Generalized modus ponens is a lifted version of modus ponens because it raises modus ponens from propositional to first-order logic.