What does the author mean by when he and himself agreed upon anything the thing was done?

What does the author mean by when he and himself agreed upon anything the thing was done?

He is simply being facetious when he says of the king, “He was greatly given to self-communing, and, when he and himself agreed upon anything, the thing was done,” it is a whimsical way of saying that the king was an autocrat and never had a need to consult anyone else about his edicts.

When the author states that the king was greatly given to self-communing What does this say about the way he rules?

One door is a hungry tiger and one is a women he has to marry no matter what. When the author states that the king “was greatly given to self-communing,” what does this say about the way he rules? This says that the King likes to go by his own rules. He follows his advice and doesn’t really listen to anyone else.

What was the choices given to the person on trial in The Lady or the Tiger?

The decisions of this tribunal were not only fair, they were positively determinate: the accused person was instantly punished if he found himself guilty, and, if innocent, he was rewarded on the spot, whether he liked it or not. There was no escape from the judgments of the king’s arena.

What does he mean by poetic justice the lady or the tiger?

This is the classic definition of poetic justice: virtue is rewarded and crime is punished. In the story, the amphitheater is understood as the vehicle of poetic justice. An accused criminal is put before two doors and asked to choose one.

What was surprising about the way the lady or the tiger ended Why did you expect something different?

The ending of “The Lady or the Tiger” by Frank Stockton is surprising because we, the readers, are left to decide what happened. The story does not give us an answer, and we have no way of knowing whether our protagonist chooses the door leading to the lady or the door leading to the tiger.

How did the semi-barbaric King refine the people?

Hover for more information. The author shows the king is semi-barbaric by describing his system of “justice.” Rather than using facts and evidence to determine whether a person is guilty or innocent of a crime, the king uses a superstitious method that is akin to having a person walk on hot coals.

How did the princess find out which door held the Lady and which door held the Tiger?

When the princess found out who the girl behind the door was by bribing the guard. When the king picked the tiger to put behind the one door.