What does the repetition of the word neutral throughout how we entered World War I?
What does the repetition of the word neutral throughout how we entered World War I?
The correct answer to the question above is the stance taken by the United States in its attempt to remain isolated from World War I. The repetition of the word “neutral” throughout the things on how we entered the Worl War I emphasizes the position of the United States in its attempt to be in the middle from the war.
Why did the US remain neutral in ww1 quizlet?
Americans adopted a policy of neutrality in WWI because the war didn’t concern the United States. Wilson protested that “sinking merchant ships without protecting the lives of passengers and crews violated international law”, and wrote a letter to Germany demanding that it stop unrestricted submarine warfare.
What statement best summarizes Wilson’s War Message to Congress?
The statement that best summarizes “Wilson’s War Message to Congress” is the following: Wilson presents Congress with a clear argument for war against Germany, which includes an outline for implementation. US President Woodrow Wilson delivered the speech known as “Wilson’s War Message to Congress” on April 2, 1917.
Which statement best describes the main idea of the third paragraph of how we entered World War I?
The correct answer is: B. US citizens were proud of themselves for ignoring the problems going on in Europe. The statement above best describes the main idea of the third paragraph of “How We Entered World War I”.
Which statement best describes the main idea of paragraph 5 which begins?
The statement that best describes the main idea of paragraph 5, which begins “For Wilson,” in “How We Entered World War 1” is the economy.
Which statement best describes the main idea of the paragraph Our country can no longer?
Which statement best describes the main idea of the paragraph? Group of answer choices: Our country can no longer refuse involvement because it cannot allow peace and freedom to be at risk.
What is the main idea of the great fire?
How does the structure of The Great Fire reinforce the central idea that there were not enough firefighters to handle the rapidly spreading fire? The cause-and-effect structure illustrates the ways the firefighters tried to put out the blaze, and the impact of their actions.
How does the author of How We entered World War I organize the information in the text?
How does the author of “How We Entered World War I” organize the information in the text? The author explains the decision to go to war by comparing and contrasting events that led to World War I. The author presents her interpretation and opinions about the United States and its reasons for entering World War I.
Which statement best describes the passage’s main idea?
Answer: The statement that best describes the main idea of the passage is that capitalism was beneficial for some people during the Industrial Revolution, but others opposed the system.
Which statement describes a difference between source 1 and source 2?
Source 1 is a secondary source, while source 2 is a primary source.
Which phrase best defines the term corroboration?
The word “corroboration” refers to the action of comparing information about some event or issue to support a certain idea or confirm it. Therefore, the statement that best defines the therm corroboration is using multiple sources to confirm a conclusion.
What is an example of corroborate?
Corroborating evidence (or corroboration) is evidence that tends to support a proposition that is already supported by some initial evidence, therefore confirming the proposition. For example, W, a witness, testifies that she saw X drive his automobile into a green car.
What is another way to think of corroboration?
Frequently Asked Questions About corroborate Some common synonyms of corroborate are authenticate, confirm, substantiate, validate, and verify. While all these words mean “to attest to the truth or validity of something,” corroborate suggests the strengthening of what is already partly established.
What is the legal definition of corroboration?
To confirm and sometimes add substantiating (reinforcing) testimony to that of another witness or a party, particularly in a trial. evidence.
What does corroborative mean?
transitive verb. : to support with evidence or authority : make more certain.
What evidence can be used in court?
Evidence: Definition and Types There are four types evidence by which facts can be proven or disproven at trial which include: Real evidence; Demonstrative evidence; Documentary evidence; and.
What is the purpose of corroboration?
Corroboration is the ability to compare information provided by two separate sources and find similarities between them. When a second source provides the same or similar information to the first, the second source is considered to corroborate (e.g. support, or agree with) with the first.
Why do historians use corroboration?
roboration is the act of comparing pieces of evidence to see where they agree or disagree. Historians corroborate to understand multiple points of view of an event to get closer to uncovering what actually happened.
Which of the following is the best example of corroborating evidence?
Purchase Orders
Why is it important to corroborate evidence?
In a court of law, corroborating evidence is used to uphold the testimony of witnesses. Something that’s corroborating confirms or gives legal support, and evidence is proof.
Why is it important for historians to corroborate information when trying to determine what happened in the past?
Historians corroborate evidence when they try to figure out what happened in the past. If they find multiple pieces of evidence that support their initial hunch, their case becomes stronger. Because the goal of corroboration is to build a strong argument, it also involves sourcing.
Is corroborating evidence necessary?
In a court of law, a judge or jury who believes that a witness is telling the truth can convict someone of a crime even without corroborating evidence. The notion that, when a witness has testified credibly, some special “corroborating evidence” is still needed in order to make a proper decision is simply incorrect.
What does evidence mean?
1a : an outward sign : indication. b : something that furnishes proof : testimony specifically : something legally submitted to a tribunal to ascertain the truth of a matter. 2 : one who bears witness especially : one who voluntarily confesses a crime and testifies for the prosecution against one’s accomplices.
What are the two main types of evidence?
There are two types of evidence; namely, direct evidence and circumstantial evidence. In this case, the People contend that there is circumstantial evidence of the defendant’s guilt.
What is a strong evidence?
Strong Evidence: • Presents an argument that makes sense. • Compelling evidence allows audience to believe. in the argument. • Based on facts, is the most valid, of any other. argument.
What is an example of strong evidence?
Types of strong evidence Strong evidence may include: Statistics. Studies. Quotes (from subject matter experts, from articles or reports by credible sources)
Can you be found guilty on hearsay?
If all the evidence against you is hearsay, it is all inadmissible. Therefore, no evidence would be admitted. You can’t be convicted if the prosecution submits no evidence of your guilt. Circumstantial evidence is admissible.
What makes a piece of evidence good?
Evidence is one of the foundations of critical thinking and good decision-making. What is good evidence? According to Linda Dyer, there are six aspects to good evidence: accuracy, precision, sufficiency, representativeness, authority and clarity of expression.
What makes a strong and thorough evidence?
Strong evidence is accurate, convincing, and relevant to the argument at hand. It comes from a credible source, and it truly supports the reason it is supposed to prove.